股动脉穿刺术后Angioseal血管封堵与压迫止血的对比

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2011.14.015

科研成果详情

题名	股动脉穿刺术后Angioseal血管封堵与压迫止血的对比
其他题名	Comparison of Angioseal closure device with manual compression
作者	林建虎; 孙军; 陆川; 陈献东
发表日期	2011-05-15
发表期刊	中国医师进修杂志影响因子和分区
语种	中文
原始文献类型	学术期刊
关键词	脑血管造影术股动脉穿刺术止血
其他关键词	Cerebral angiography ; Femoral artery ; Punctures ; Hemostasis
摘要	目的评价Angioseal封堵器在脑血管介入经皮股动脉穿刺术后止血的实用性及安全性。方法选择行脑血管造影或介入治疗的病例128例,其中脑血管造影93例,介入治疗35例。按止血方法不同分为单纯压迫组(83例)和血管封堵组(45例)。结果脑血管造影:血管封堵组止血时间为(1.8±0.8)min,下肢制动时间为(3.8±0.8)h,明显短于单纯压迫组的(20.2±9.4)min和(19.4±2.2)h(P<0.01)。介入治疗:血管封堵组止血时间为(2.0±1.1)min,下肢制动时间为(4.3±1.5)h,亦明显短于单纯压迫组的(24.5±10.3)min和(24.3±3.2)h(P<0.01)。单纯压迫组术后并发症发生率,如渗血、血肿、术后皮肤溃破、水疱发生率等,明显高于血管封堵组(P<0.01)。结论 Angioseal封堵器止血简便、实用、安全,值得临床应用。
其他摘要	Objective To assess the safety and efficiency of Angioseal device in patients undergoing percutaneous femoral artery puncture in brain angiograph or interventional therapy. Methods A prospective trial was carried out in 128 patients undergoing brain angiograph and interventional therapy,in which 93undergoing brain angiography and 35 interventionsl therapy. All patients were divided into pure compression group by manual compression (83 cases) and vascular blocking group by Angioseal device (45 cases)according to different hemostatic measures. Results In angiography, hemostasis time of vascular blocking group and pure compression group was (1.8 ±0.8) min and(20.2 ±9.4) min (P＜0.01 ),ambulation time was (3.8 ± 0.8) h and (19.4 ± 2.2) h (P ＜ 0.01). In interventional therapy,hemostasis time of vascular blocking group and pure compression group was (2.0 ± 1.1) min and (24.5 ± 10.3) min (P ＜ 0.01), ambulation time was (4.3 ± 1.5) h and (24.3 ± 3.2) h (P＜ 0.01). Pure compression group had higher complication rate (such as bleeding,hematoma,skin ulceration and blister) than vascular blocking group (P＜0.01).Conclusion Angioseal closure device is safe, efficient and easy to use.
ISSN	1673-4904
卷号	34 期号:14 页码:37-39
DOI	10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2011.14.015
页数	0
收录类别	CNKI ; 万方 ; ISTIC
URL	查看原文
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	https://kms.wmu.edu.cn/handle/3ETUA0LF/74678
专题	附属第二医院_神经外科
作者单位	温州市第二人民医院温州医学院定理学院神经外科
第一作者单位	温州医科大学
第一作者的第一单位	温州医科大学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	林建虎,孙军,陆川,等. 股动脉穿刺术后Angioseal血管封堵与压迫止血的对比[J]. 中国医师进修杂志,2011,34(14):37-39.
APA	林建虎, 孙军, 陆川, & 陈献东. (2011). 股动脉穿刺术后Angioseal血管封堵与压迫止血的对比. 中国医师进修杂志, 34(14), 37-39.
MLA	林建虎,et al."股动脉穿刺术后Angioseal血管封堵与压迫止血的对比".中国医师进修杂志 34.14(2011):37-39.