Comparison of the performance of two depression rating scales in patients with epilepsy in southern China

doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107025

科研成果详情

题名	Comparison of the performance of two depression rating scales in patients with epilepsy in southern China
作者	Xia, Nian-ge1; Ding, Si-qi 1; Lin, Jia-he 1; Dong, Fei-rong2; Du, Yan-ru 1; Wang, Xin-shi1; Chen, Yan-yan 1; Zhu, Zhen-guo1; Zheng, Rong-yuan1; Xu, Hui-qin1
发表日期	2020-05
发表期刊	EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR 影响因子和分区
语种	英语
原始文献类型	Article
关键词	Depression Epilepsy Neurological Disorder Depression Inventory for Epilepsy Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
其他关键词	MAJOR DEPRESSION ; HOSPITAL ANXIETY ; PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITY ; SPANISH VERSION ; SCREENING TOOLS ; DISORDERS ; INVENTORY ; VALIDATION ; HEALTH ; RELIABILITY
摘要	Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of the Chinese version of the Neurological Disorder Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (CNDDI-E) with that of the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (C-HADS-D) as screening tools for depression in the same patients with epilepsy (PWE). Methods: A total of 213 consecutive PWE were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed using the C-NDDI-E and C-HADS-D as predictors and the Chinese version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (C-MINI) as the gold standard. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for the C-NDDI-E was 0.870, and the optimal cutoff score was N11 (sensitivity 85.71%, specificity 79.78%); for the C-HADS-D, the AUC was 0.804, and the optimal cutoff score was N5 (sensitivity 85.71%, specificity 62.36%). The AUC for the C-NDDI-E was larger than the AUC for the C-HADS-D, but the comparison of the AUCs revealed no significant differences (P= 0.1444). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the C-NDDI-E and C-HADS-D have high validity and support the use of these screening tools for depression in PWE. Moreover, the C-NDDI-E is a better screening scale for diagnosing depression than the C-HADS-D according to the results of this study. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
资助项目	Wenzhou Public Welfare Science and Technology Plan Project [Y20170346, Y20170067]; Project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Health, China [2020KY180]
出版者	ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
出版地	SAN DIEGO
ISSN	1525-5050
EISSN	1525-5069
卷号	106 页码:107025
DOI	10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107025
页数	5
WOS类目	Behavioral Sciences ; Clinical Neurology ; Psychiatry
WOS研究方向	Behavioral Sciences ; Neurosciences & Neurology ; Psychiatry
WOS记录号	WOS:000533986000015
收录类别	SCIE ; PUBMED ; SCOPUS
URL	查看原文
PubMed ID	32199345
SCOPUSEID	2-s2.0-85081687865
通讯作者地址	[Xu, Hui-qin]Department of Neurology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,325000,China
Scopus学科分类	Neurology;Neurology (clinical);Behavioral Neuroscience
引用统计	被引频次：2[WOS] [WOS记录] [WOS相关记录]
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	https://kms.wmu.edu.cn/handle/3ETUA0LF/13285
专题	第一临床医学院（信息与工程学院）、附属第一医院_内科学_神经内科附属第一医院精神医学学院_精神医学系
通讯作者	Xu, Hui-qin
作者单位	1.Department of Neurology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,325000,China; 2.Department of Psychiatry,the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,325000,China
第一作者单位	附属第一医院; 第一临床医学院（信息与工程学院）、附属第一医院
通讯作者单位	附属第一医院; 第一临床医学院（信息与工程学院）、附属第一医院
第一作者的第一单位	附属第一医院
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Xia, Nian-ge,Ding, Si-qi,Lin, Jia-he,et al. Comparison of the performance of two depression rating scales in patients with epilepsy in southern China[J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR,2020,106:107025.
APA	Xia, Nian-ge., Ding, Si-qi., Lin, Jia-he., Dong, Fei-rong., Du, Yan-ru., ... & Xu, Hui-qin. (2020). Comparison of the performance of two depression rating scales in patients with epilepsy in southern China. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 106, 107025.
MLA	Xia, Nian-ge,et al."Comparison of the performance of two depression rating scales in patients with epilepsy in southern China".EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR 106(2020):107025.