科研成果详情

题名Comparison of a Small Central versus a Large Peripheral Perforator in a Rat Model of Extended Dorsal Three-Vascular Territory Perforator Flap
作者
发表日期2017-02
发表期刊PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY   影响因子和分区
语种英语
原始文献类型Article
其他关键词INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR ; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION ; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS ; VASCULAR ANATOMY ; DELAY PHENOMENON ; DIEP FLAP ; CUTANEOUS FLAP ; SKIN FLAP ; EXPERIENCE ; PERFUSION
摘要Background: Selection of suitable perforators is critical for satisfactory postre-constructive surgery outcome. This study aims to compare a small central versus a large peripheral perforator flap in a rat extended dorsal three-vascular territory perforator flap model. Methods: An extended intercostal artery perforator flap with three vascular territories was used to model a small central perforator flap. An extended deep circumflex iliac artery flap with three vascular territories was used to model a large peripheral perforator flap. Flap viability, angiography, and perfusion were compared. Results: Intercostal artery flaps showed significantly higher relative viable area than deep circumflex iliac artery flaps (98.5 +/- 3.2 percent versus 87.1 +/- 7.3 percent; p < 0.01). Angiography revealed that the anatomical and the first adjacent territories were perfused successfully in both types of flap, but the second adjacent territory of deep circumflex iliac artery flaps was not perfused sufficiently, thus ultimately leading to flap necrosis. Perfusion at the anatomical and the first adjacent territories of both types of flap increased significantly for 3 days (p < 0.05) and became stable 5 to 7 days after surgery. Perfusion at the second adjacent territory of deep circumflex iliac artery flaps diminished continuously. Conclusions: A small central perforator may supply a larger vascular territory than a large peripheral perforator. Both the size and the location of a perforator should be considered for optimizing the design of an extended perforator flap.
资助项目National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81171695]; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejing Province of China [LY15H060010]
出版者LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
出版地PHILADELPHIA
ISSN0032-1052
EISSN1529-4242
卷号139期号:2页码:434E-443E
DOI10.1097/PRS.0000000000002991
页数10
WOS类目Surgery
WOS研究方向Surgery
WOS记录号WOS:000394059300030
收录类别SCIE ; PUBMED ; SCOPUS
URL查看原文
PubMed ID28121874
SCOPUSEID2-s2.0-85010888022
通讯作者地址[Gao, Weiyang]Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Hand & Plast Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, 109 West Xue Yuan Rd, Wenzhou 325000, Peoples R China.
Scopus学科分类Surgery
TOP期刊TOP期刊
引用统计
被引频次:9[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符https://kms.wmu.edu.cn/handle/3ETUA0LF/13843
专题基础医学院(机能实验教学中心)_形态学系_人体解剖学
通讯作者Gao, Weiyang
作者单位
Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Hand & Plast Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, 109 West Xue Yuan Rd, Wenzhou 325000, Peoples R China; Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Anat, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
第一作者单位基础医学院(机能实验教学中心)_形态学系_人体解剖学
通讯作者单位第二临床医学院,附属第二医院、育英儿童医院;  附属第二医院
第一作者的第一单位基础医学院(机能实验教学中心)_形态学系_人体解剖学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Ding, Jian,Feng, Xiaoliang,Gao, Weiyang,et al. Comparison of a Small Central versus a Large Peripheral Perforator in a Rat Model of Extended Dorsal Three-Vascular Territory Perforator Flap[J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY,2017,139(2):434E-443E.
APA Ding, Jian., Feng, Xiaoliang., Gao, Weiyang., Yan, Hede., Tao, Xianyao., ... & Tang, Maolin. (2017). Comparison of a Small Central versus a Large Peripheral Perforator in a Rat Model of Extended Dorsal Three-Vascular Territory Perforator Flap. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 139(2), 434E-443E.
MLA Ding, Jian,et al."Comparison of a Small Central versus a Large Peripheral Perforator in a Rat Model of Extended Dorsal Three-Vascular Territory Perforator Flap".PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 139.2(2017):434E-443E.

条目包含的文件

条目无相关文件。
个性服务
查看访问统计
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Ding, Jian]的文章
[Feng, Xiaoliang]的文章
[Gao, Weiyang]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Ding, Jian]的文章
[Feng, Xiaoliang]的文章
[Gao, Weiyang]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Ding, Jian]的文章
[Feng, Xiaoliang]的文章
[Gao, Weiyang]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。